Up until now I've been describing Permaculture clifnotes, basically, through the filters of my own limited experience. No real new information, but a sort of review, a review I myself have orbited for some time. Afraid to meet on a more intimate basis, but too wise to abandon.
Mollison has laid out an ethic I find to be authentic, applicable, and deliciously subversive. He's done his part, as a teacher. What is my part, as a student??
Does one begin with the prime directive, or rules of conservative use? Chapter Two is entitled "Concepts and Themes in Design. I don't want to talk about the hows and whys of design just yet. I want to talk about the hows and whys of destroying what is already there. Because, by my standards, this is the most neglected area of transformative literature today.
Nothing happens in a vacuum. Not finances, not marriage, not diet. For all the information out there on how to create a new you, there is almost no information on how to dispose of the old self. The ego that demands change in the first place.
This is significant because the self, the ego, will fight tooth and nail to maintain the status quo. There is a reason certain women go from abusive relationship to abusive relationship, why addicts switch vices more easily than they outgrow a crutch, why I crave crappy jobs. That reason in the same for everyone and unique to each of us. And real change is not possible if that reason is not addressed.
We each encompass a certain identity within a particular context. That identity is largely shaped by what we thick we are. Unfortunately, few of us know ourselves very well. Humans are natural hypocrites. We are also, quite perversely, drawn most strongly to what we most want to avoid. Thoreau rightly diagnosed man's "quiet desperation," (as well as, I believe, the cure). Even the ambitious and successful among us seem to operate within an ever-changing context with a fairly static identity. Circumstances change, but only to the extent that we allow them.
There is only one way that I know to fuel voluntary change and growth without the benefit of a significant change in environment: one must recognize the area in which one is wrong, accept that inadequacy, and learn a different belief.
Every choice that anyone has ever made, right or wrong by any standard, was justified by the maker at that time. We can, and will, justify our every decision. To break our diet, smoke a cigarette, cheat on our spouse, buy a car...So we must recognize that our reasons for behaving in any way are not special or right simply because they are justified, even if you have a "good reason." Everyone always has a good reason.
What's more insidious is that we will habitually set the terms and maintain the conditions for our reasons. We'll break up with one drunk, but we'll go to bars to meet men. We'll quit the terrible job, but we'll apply for the very next one on craigslist out of fear that nothing better will come up in time. We'll greet a pay raise with a slight increase in living expenses, such as an upgraded cell phone. Thus we maintain our unhappy identity and rationale for irrational behavior.
Remember I suggested that "self-acceptance," should replace "population control," as the third ethic of permaculture? This is why: through self-acceptance, we can recognize the areas of life in which we are wrong and work to change them. Self-acceptance means looking at an area in life we are unhappy and being able to say, "this is within my control. I choose to live this way, I can choose to change."
Why do we overeat? Because we want to. Why do we overspend? Because we want to. Maybe it doesn't bring us joy, but for some reason we choose not to pursue joy. We can't change until we accept full-responsibility for our own circumstances (and those of our children!!!)
Every behavior is voluntary, even if rooted in subconscious notions. For example, codependent people seek out weak friends and associates so as to be needed. As a result, they suffer from over-work, over-commitment, and vulnerability stemming from not being able to occasionally lean on anyone else. Many people feel so vulnerable that they push everyone away so as to make anyone who loves them need to prove it. Some of us are so afraid of failure that we refuse to follow through with any truly ambitious project.
To Achieve Real Change, then, one must:
1. Identify the area of unhappiness.
2. Recognize the behavior fueling that unhappiness.
3. Identify the justification for that behavior.
4. Isolate the belief at the root of that justification.
5. Learn a new belief.
For example:
1. I am unhappy because I spend more than I earn.
2. I spend more than I earn largely because of my expensive commute.
3. My commute is expensive because I drive a long way to work, because I like my job, and I like my house, and I don't want to change either.
4. I can get neither a better house nor a better apartment, Austin is expensive, and I want to be settled.
5. My sense of security should not be tied to my job or my house. My job, good or bad, does not define me, and I deserve a home that is within comfortable distance of where I actually want to be. The time has come to meet my own needs and provide for myself, and to stop maintaining a state of poverty so as to excuse me from dealing with the big scary world of being a capable adult.
...Or something like that.